Next: References Up: Diffuse Scattering Previous: Acknowledgements

Figures

Figure 1

Ribbon drawing of one yeast initiator tRNA molecule using RIBBONS [Carson, 1987]. Note the double helical character in the acceptor stem and anti-codon regions. Aminoacylated amino acids are attached to the 3'-OH end of the acceptor stem. The three nucleic acid bases that provide the base-pairing specificity for the start codon on the messenger RNA are located at the tip of the anti-codon loop.

Figure 2

Calculations of the X-ray scattering from yeast initiator tRNA crystals. The experimental image, a, corresponds to a 1.5 rotation photograph recorded on an imaging plate set 200 mm from the crystal using 1.3 Å radiation. The red arrows point to the streaks elongated perpendicular to the c axis, which, in the calculated image, b, are modeled as lattice-coupled motions along the pseudo-helix axis. The white arrow points to the very diffuse cloud which is modeled as local intra-molecular motion in the anti-codon arm. The corresponding unit cell orientation is shown in c with a single tRNA molecule colored yellow and the symmetry-related molecules and unit cell outline in blue. Magnifications of the top right quadrant from the experimental and calculated diffraction images are shown in d and e, respectively. The upper right hand quadrant of each of these images shows a close correspondence in the diffuse intensity. The magnified images have been globally rescaled slightly to correct for the absorption seen in the lower right quadrant in image a. The experimental diffraction and the diffuse scattering calculations are colored such that the least intense features appear blue, intermediate intensities pink, and the most intense features yellow. The lack of circularly symmetric intensity in the experimental image, a, is partially accounted for by significant absorption.

Figure 3

Calculation of diffuse scattering from another tRNA crystal orientation. The experimental image is shown in a, the calculated image in b, and the unit cell orientation in c. The experimental parameters are the same as in Figure 2 except that 1.17 Å radiation was used. The parameters used in the diffuse scattering calculations were identical to those in Figure 2. Again, the red arrows point to the streaks elongated perpendicular to the c axis, which, in the calculated image, b, are modeled as lattice-coupled motions along the pseudo-helix axis, while the white arrows point to the very diffuse clouds which are modeled as local intra-molecular motion in the anti-codon arm.

Figure 4

Diffuse scattering components used in each of the calculations, Figures 2b (row 1) and 3b (row2). Rows 1 and 2: (from left to right) long-range lattice-coupled motion perpendicular to the c axis , long-range lattice-coupled motion along the c axis, and short-range motion local to the anti-codon arm. Row 3: calculated scattering from bulk water (left) and independent atom motion scattering (right).

Figure 5

Ribbon drawing of two tRNA molecules illustrating the possible flexing behavior of tRNA derived from analysis of the Bragg-associated diffuse scattering. Specifically, motion strongly coupled along the pseudo-helical axis (marked by arrows), but relatively uncorrelated with the distal half of the anti-codon arm, results in the flexion. The motion along the direction of the arrows has been exaggerated to demonstrate the flexing action better.

Figure 6

Schematic stick figure animation illustrating local motion of base pairs in the anti-codon loop (separated by approximately 3.0 Å). This picture is based upon information derived from the analysis of the very diffuse clouds in Figures 2a and 3a (white arrows). This representation illustrates the local motion of the nucleic acid bases while still preserving the approximate base-pair separation.



Next: References Up: Diffuse Scattering Previous: Acknowledgements


anandk@bioc.rice.edu